SLOBODAN - A SYMBOL
OF RESISTANCE TO NATO AGGRESSION
Press conference by Christopher Black,
lawyer from Toronto, member of the
International Committee for the Defense
of Slobodan Milosevic.
"It
is absolutely clear that no evidence can
be provided in proceedings against
Slobodan Milosevic and that keeping him
in custody is exclusively politically
motivated," said Christopher
Black, adding that, according to
information he gathered, 250 political
prisoners, mostly members of the Left,
were in Serbian jails.
In Black's view, demands for Milosevic's
extradition to The Hague derive from a
simple fact that the West is eager to get
rid of the guilt for unprecedented
bombing of Yugoslavia. By sentencing
Milosevic before a court that can hardly
be called a court of law, the United
States and other Western countries, as
Black put it, want to wash their hands of
the war they wagged contrary to all
international norms.
Black said he had just returned from
Africa, where the people he had spoken to
were astonished by the fact that the
symbol of resistance to NATO aggression
was in jail. Referring to the work of the
International Crime Tribunal for the
Former Yugoslavia, Black said that unlike
other courts, this
"quasi-court" presumed people
guilty, rather than innocent. It would
not be logical, said Black, to expect it
to be "fair" when one bears in
mind the way it was financed. All trials
held before the court were typical
political cases and one should not look
forward to a fair trial to Milosevic, or
Karadzic and Mladic should they be
extradited to The Hague, concluded Black.
Watch Video (Videos
are in Real format, You need RealPlayer8 to
watch them)
DENIAL OF MEDICAL TREATMENT THREATENS
MILOSEVIC'S LIFE
by Jared Israel and George Szamuely [11
May 2001]
We are
members of the International Committee
(ICDSM) that is circulating the petition
to Free President Milosevic from jail.
In our view, Slobodan Milosevic's arrest
is a clear escalation of Washington's
attempt to destroy Yugoslav sovereignty.
Washington is demanding that Milosevic be
transferred to The Hague where a show
trial would be staged. This trial would
blame the Serbian people for NATO's
crimes of aggression. Meanwhile, Mr.
Milosevic is being denied critical
medical treatment.
A group of doctors who are deputies in
the Serbian and Yugoslav Parliaments have
examined Slobodan Milosevic's medical
file. The doctors belong to different
parties. Some are members of the
governing coalition. The doctors have
written a Medical Appeal. It expresses in
the sharpest possible medical language
their concerns about Milosevic's health.
Below is our summary of the doctors'
statement, written in layman's language,
followed by the doctors' Appeal itself.
SUMMARY OF PHYSICIANS' APPEAL
While in jail, President Milosevic has
been suffering from crisis hypertension.
He has also suffered a cardiac
infarction. He was taken to a hospital
and underwent a brief treatment.
Following this, he should have been kept
in intensive care under the supervision
of specialists. Instead he was almost
immediately returned to his jail cell,
where the only follow-up treatment
consists of receiving two medications.
The doctors state it bluntly: Never in
medical history have these medications
cured a condition such as that of Mr.
Milosevic. By keeping him in jail, rather
than in intensive care under specialist
supervision, the government is subjecting
President Milosevic to suffering heart
failure or stroke, unavoidable under his
present conditions.
We urge all readers of this summary, and
the medical statement below, to sign the
petition "FREE MILOSEVIC NOW".
President Milosevic's medical condition
is itself sufficient reason for freeing
him. In addition, though Belgrade
officials have kept the former President
in jail for six weeks, supposedly so that
they could present evidence of alleged
crimes, they have yet to bring forth a
single witness against him. What further
evidence is needed that his arrest was
simply an attempt to satisfy a US
Administration that is determined to
punish the leader of a small country who
had the temerity to assert his nation's
sovereignty? One must also ask: Given
this clear denial of necessary medical
treatment, is this part of an effort,
orchestrated by Washington, to ensure
that President Milosevic dies in prison
before his scheduled show trial collapses
through its own absurdity?
APPEAL OF YUGOSLAV DOCTORS
The following as an
Appeal from Physicians who are Deputies
of the Federal and Republican
Parliaments, to the authorities of the
Republic of Serbia and the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia, and to the
medical and general public, urging
adequate therapy for treating Slobodan
Miloevic and the provision of
proper conditions in which treatment can
take place.
PREVENT THE FATAL
OUTCOME OF MILOSEVIC`S HEART DISEASE
DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN HIS TACIT MURDER
The severely ill
Slobodan Miloevic can be
effectively treated only by highly
competent, highly specialized staff in
conditions in which exacerbation such as
sudden cardiac death, stroke or other
complications, unavoidable in current
conditions, can be avoided.
We, medical doctors, members of the
National Assembly of the Republic of
Serbia and the Parliament of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia, had access to the
medical records of Slobodan
Miloevic and having obtained the
opinion of a competent team of experts,
herein address the medical and general
public by this appeal devoid of political
bias, based exclusively on the principles
of the medical profession and of science.
We describe his health conditions as
follows:
1. Psychological aspects
of heart disease
2. Symmetrical
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
3. Hypertensive crisis
(malignant hypertension)
4.
Conclusion
1. Psychological
aspects of heart disease:
Stress is defined as
an experience in which the circumstances
exceed the capacity of the person to
cope, resulting in excessive excitement
of the person.
For more than fifty years now it has been
widely known that conditions such as
hypertension and asthma may reflect
unconscious conflicts manifested in
somatic symptoms.
Emotions are experienced both
psychologically and physiologically.
Although the forms of these cognitive
manifestations of emotions may vary a
great deal (anger, fear, anxiety, joy),
the somatic repertoire of autonomous
responses is limited. Emotional
excitement, via the centrally induced
sympathetic discharge, is manifested in
the cerebrovascular system similarly to
physical stress or strain: by
tachycardia, elevated blood pressure,
increased oxygen consumption, accelerated
muscular flow and fall of splenic and
renal flows. Cardiovascular consequences
of emotion, as opposed to physical
strain, may be more harmful because of
absence of accompanying muscular activity
and metabolic vasodilatation. Thus, the
emotional stress accelerates the heart
rate increasing the heart load.
Accumulation of small stresses resulting
from long-term conflicts promotes
development of essential hypertension and
coronary atherosclerosis.
Increased neurohumoral activity
(adrenocortical, sympathetic,
rennin-angiotensin) resulting from stress
contributes to dysfunction of endothelial
cells. Increased activity of the
sympathic system influences the lipid
metabolism, as well. The cholesterol
level correlates with depression and
emotional instability in a positive
manner, while it is negatively correlated
with motivation and joy. Therefore, both
atherosclerotic plaques and clots and
vasospasm are related to stress reaction.
Stress may result in elevated blood
pressure, but there is no evidence that
it may maintain hypertension. In absence
of other promoters, stress may act as a
trigger. It is frequently accompanied
with numerous arrhythmias that may result
in sudden cardiac death. Norepinephrine
and isoproterenol (endogenous
catecholamines) may lead to development
of "contraction bands",
myocardial lesions similar to skeletal
lesions that burst upon excessive
contraction. Such lesions are associated
with 80% victims of sudden death,
including those in whom atherosclerosis
has not been previously diagnosed. These
changes were recorded in pilots who lost
control over their planes, patients with
pheochromocytoma, cocaine-induced death.
The changes in the cell wall permeability
permitting excessive Ca2+ influx may be
the underlying mechanism of this
phenomenon.
[back to
top]
2. Symmetrical
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
From the hemodynamic
point of view, these patients have
hyperdynamic systolic function with high
ejection fraction (estimated at 70% on
coronarography and shown in the form of a
banana-shaped cavity in the systole).
This "supernormal" systolic
function leads to increased O2
consumption that, together with abnormal
blood flow through the myocardium may
result in symptoms of ischemia. The basic
difference between this and hypertensive
heart disease is absence of history of
hypertension in the former.
[back to
top]
3. Hypertensive
crisis (malignant hypertension)
This is an emergency
conditions necessitating prompt therapy.
It is characterized with one or more of
the following signs:
ˇ Acute or prolonged elevation of
diastolic blood pressure to >120 mm
Hg.
ˇ Papillary edema (not necessarily),
ˇ Signs of progressive renal failure,
ˇ Signs of CNS dysfunction,
ˇ (two of these signs are required to
establish the diagnosis).
The absolute level of blood pressure is
of lesser importance than the rate of
elevation and absolute difference between
the usual values and those measured in
crisis.
Emergency therapy is necessitated since
hypertensive encephalopathy, acute
dissection of aorta, pulmonary edema,
pheochromocytoma-related crisis,
intracranial hemorrhage may develop.
Therapy: In the acute phases the patient
should be strictly immobilized with
headrest at 30o. These are acutely ill
people, usually extremely anxious. It is
of utmost importance to provide peaceful,
supportive environment. Admission to
intensive care unit is crucial, 12-lead
EEG, intravenous therapy (with
measurements of central venous pressure,
if possible), arterial line of
nitropruside is administered, all
laboratory analysis, (accompanied with
fundus oculi examination as well as
neurological and nephrological
consultation) are required.
Interestingly:
ˇ The first echoardiographic examination
was made on the day of admission to the
coronary unit when the patient manifested
ischemia of the apico-lateral part of the
heart accompanied with ECG changes. Thus,
the patients had objective confirmation
of his condition during the reported
pain. Since coronarography findings were
normal, the pressure of the muscular
bridge on the anterior descending
coronary artery (more so because it was
seen before the actual branching) or
microvascular angina (small vessels were
diagnosed as very poor) were suspected.
This means that the patient should be
treated as a cardiac patient in spite of
the fact that his major vessels are
patent.
ˇ Since ventriculography shows marked
wall hypertrophy (echography contradicts
these findings, since echo images showed
only mild hypertrophy) with typical
banana-like image in the systole, he
probably has a history of HCM,
particularly in the light of the fact
that his blood pressure used to be
controlled well. Therefore, one cannot
draw a conclusion that he has had history
of severe hypertension for 20 years
resulting in the ventricular thickness.
In order to rule out this condition,
heart biopsy should be performed.
STRESS - risk for sudden heart death.
[back to
top]
4. Conclusion
On April 11th, at the
initial examination, the prison
physicians suspected the development of
acute coronary syndrome and asked for
cardiological consultation.
A multidisciplinary team (headed by Dr.
Nekovic) suspected acute cardiac
ischemia because of typical echographic
findings (akinesia, i.e. completely
static cardiac apex, together with apical
part of the anterior, lateral wall and
the septum) and ECG findings (2 mm ST
segment depression, negative T waves) and
asked for emergency coronarography!
If any other patient had had such
findings and if the multidisciplinary
team had met in Bujanovac where no
conditions for invasive diagnostic
procedures were available, the patient
would have been placed in a coronary
unit, where strict rest would have been
prescribed with nitroglycerin and heparin
infusion, as in the case of
Miloevic!
His family would have been advised that
he had had an infarct and all protective
measures would have been introduced. Even
if no typical ECG evolution of acute
infarction (Q tooth formation) developed,
it would have been defined as a case of
non-Q infarction (subendocardial) where
reperfusion of the surrounding tissues
ensued.
Had this happened to Miloevic in
Ni or any other major town, he
would have received streptokinase in the
first six hours after the occurrence of
pain (because of the accompanying
echographic and ECG findings)!
Dr. Nekovic and late Dr. Popovic
wrote to Miloevic, while he was in
office, describing him the nature of
coronary disease, elevated blood pressure
substantiating longer history of
these symptoms.
After coronarography, the patient has
recovered, although his discharge summary
says that 24 after the procedure no ECG
or echographic abnormalities are present
(the same as on admission). They even
contemplated discharging him a few hours
after coronarography.
He will be the first patient cured by
this procedure!
Incompatibility of his echographic
findings and ventriculography is another
problem. Ventriculography shows typical
image of HMC, while the echography is
suggestive of simple hypertensive
hypertrophy.
Also, the presence of the muscular bridge
before the branching of the anterior
descending artery and denuded
microcirculation provide the basis for
the diagnosis of microvascular angina.
The blood pressure variations occurring
abruptly and acutely, substantially
aberrant from the normally recorded ones,
make us ask: Is there any other place in
the world where hypertensive crisis is
managed with a tablet of presolol and
prilazide?
Complete investigation was ordered as
early as April 23rd, but what has been
done so far?
How can such a serious condition be
diagnosed in prison conditions that
require a multidisciplinary approach?
The warning and our appeal suggest the
only possible conclusion: the severely
ill Slobodan Miloevic can be
effectively treated only by highly
competent, highly specialized staff in
conditions in which exacerbation such as
sudden cardiac death, stroke or other
complications unavoidable in current
conditions can be avoided.
We also warn the public that even well
regulated blood pressure, according to
the referential data, may cause stroke in
38% of cases so that in this particular
case we wonder what one can expect
knowing the conditions in which
Miloevic is treated.
In Belgrade, May 9th 2001.
Glen Wreggitt,
Winnipeg, Canada
I am signing this petition because I feel
I must do something, make some gesture,
even one of little significance (although
the significance of this petition grows
with each new signature). I want to help
fight against the slander, destruction
and manipulation that has been and is
still being directed against Serbia and
the former Yugoslav Republic by "the
West". I want my voice added to the
many that defy the bloody Orwellian hand
of imperialism to say: We are not fooled
by your lies. We see your true nature. We
know that human rights and human lives
are nothing more to you than a lever with
which to extend your exploitation, wealth
and power!
Luchezar Georgiev, Varna, Bulgaria
Thank you for the opportunity to express
my protest against the arrest of the
great Yugoslavian statesman Slobodan
Milosevic. Best regards from Varna,
Bulgaria!
Carla Berg, Austria
I am signing the "Free
Milosevic!" petition because of the
violations of international law by which
the International Criminal Tribunal for
the former Yugoslavia (the ICTY or 'War
Crimes Tribunal') was established.
The U.N. Charter provides the Security
Council (SC) with authority to take
measures in the event of acts of
aggression, threats to the peace or
breaches of the peace. A primary problem
is that given the SC's structure, its
members enjoy de facto immunity. With
that in mind, Article 41 provides the SC
with authority to negotiate, use
arbitration, diplomatic methods, and
similar such measures to address the
aforementioned acts.
However, the SC does not have a legal
basis to establish judicial bodies.
According to international law, the
practical method of establishing any
international judicial body must begin
with a treaty. Once such a treaty has
been ratified, the judicial body can be
created by the U.N. General Assembly -
not by the Security Council. The reasons
for this are two cornerstones principles
of international law: state sovereignty
and state equality.
The ICTY has determined, in the case of
Prosecutor v. Blaskic, that it, as an
organ of the SC, is superior to states.
This contradicts the language of its
statute, which requires states to
"co-operate." By taking the
position that it, and incidentally its
prosecutor, as an "organ" of
the ICTY, is superior to any state, the
ICTY is behaving in a manner consistent
with the "rule of law" as
defined by the Ottoman Sultan.
It is worth mentioning that Selim III
declared a "new world order" in
1793, in an effort to subdue rebellious
Suzerain States. The Suzerain states had
their governments, but ultimately,
authority was placed in the Sultan. Bad
behavior got punishment, compliance got
rewards. Sound familiar?
Another significant point is the fact
that, normally, parties to a legal
dispute have equal status before a
neutral court. The structure of the ICTY
defies this principle, since it places
the Prosecutor above the accused by
virtue of the Prosecutor's status as an
organ of the court. Then there is the
question of an absence of separation of
powers, since the ICTY and Prosecutor
have legislative abilities under the
statute.
Another factor lies in the fact that
unlike under the treaty establishing the
International Court of Justice (ICJ) or
the International Criminal Court (ICC)
treaty, the ICTY has been left to
establish its own rules of court. As
noted in Prosecutor v. Tadic, they make
up the rules as they go along.
The ICTY, in its rules, also has denied
the accused basic rights as provided
under the declaration of human rights and
the Covenant on Civil and political
rights. Example: the presumption of
innocence. The Milosevic indictment
demonstrates that in fact the Tribunal
indicts first, therefore presuming guilt,
and investigates later. See Diana
Johnstone's 'Humanitarian War: Making the
Crime fit the punishment' for further
elaboration on this point. (1)
In short I will not sit back and watch as
the law is turned into something ala
Orwell's 'Animal Farm' in which the truth
is 'propaganda' and racism is acceptable.
'Two legs bad, four legs good' is not all
that different from saying 'Serbs bad,
NATO good.'
If one examines, even casually, the ICTY
committee's final report to the
Prosecutor concerning NATO's 78 day act
of aggression, and if at the same time we
at least bother to look at the U.N.
Charter, the customs of war, and other
applicable laws, we find something that
if it were not so tragic, it truly would
be hilarious.
1. Grdilica Bridge-Train Bombing.
No need to investigate. After all the
NATO pilot really was trying to bomb the
bridge. But after hitting the civilian
passenger train, all that nasty smoke got
in the way, so they couldn't see what
they were doing and bombed it again.
2. Djakovica.
No need to investigate. NATO has
consistently maintained that it did not
hit the Djakovica civilian convoy with
intent to attack civilians. NATO's
consistency involved three versions of
this incident. 1. The Serbs did it. 2. We
did it, but we thought from at 15,000
feet in the air, those tractors were
military vehicles. 3. We did it, but
Military was mixed in with those
civilians . No need to investigate
because it is real hard to see what you
are attacking from 15,000 feet in the
air.
3. RTS (Serbian TV station)
It is a military target because it served
'dual purpose,' says the ICTY. Besides
NATO believed it was exclusively used to
incite hatred and propaganda.
But when NATO leaders compared Milosevic
with Hitler, that wasn't inciting hatred,
it was a compliment, right? Conditioning
people around the world to look upon
Serbs as vicious animals is not inciting
hatred, right?
By the ICTY's reasoning, any media
outlet, during a war, will be justifiably
attacked, in direct contradiction to the
Geneva Conventions of 1949, because the
media outlet is failing to convey the
message that NATO is giving us some
educational bombing.
The 'dual purpose' argument flies in the
face of the fact that the U.S. Department
of Defense's review of the bombing
campaign solely and exclusively
identifies propaganda as the
justification for selecting it as a
target. According to Amnesty
International, NATO officials told them
the same thing. In short NATO lied to its
own Kangaroo court!
The question is who is going to be the
next target state, and which leader is
going to be introduced to justice, NATO
style? Which national group is going to
be the next to be subjected to an ongoing
incitement of hatred by way of NATO, who
after all is only bombing people back to
the stone age for humanitarian reasons.
Marek Glogoczowski, Zakopane, Poland
I, the undersigned demand that the
Serbian authorities immediately release
Slobodan Milosevic and all other Serbian
patriots from jail.
J J van Kempen, Netherlands
I sign the petition (demand), because Mr.
Milosevic did just that what a head of
state is supposed to do.
Richard Piper, Canada
My name is Richard Piper. I'm an engineer
(retired) and I wish to sign the Petition
to free Slobodan Milosevic. My wife Gemma
Gauthier, teacher (retired) also wants to
sign. Slobo is no more guilty than
Tujman, Izetbegovic, Thaci, Clinton,
Blair. Congratulations for this
initiative.
George V. Fatsi, USA
The U.S. and NATO were planning the
destruction of Yugoslavia for many years.
They are the real criminals. Slobo is a
true patriot.
Jerome Schretter, France
I have read the petition calling for
liberation of former Yugoslav President
Milosevic and all other Serbian
(Yugoslav) patriots who defended their
country against NATO. I fully support
this call and ask you to add my name to
the list of signatories. Thank you.
Tony Delapa, U.S.A.
I live in the USA but I'm originally from
Italy. I thank you for adding my name to
petition. Keep up the great work.
Branka Perry, London, England
I would like to see a list of Milosevic's
alleged misdeeds in black and white. I do
not want to see him sentenced on the
basis of gossip and propaganda. The
charge of atrocities has been
discredited, e.g. the suppressed Racak
forensic report stated that the dead were
combatants and civilians caught in
crossfire. The indictment of Milosevic
was issued during the bombing which
prevented independent verification of the
charges.
The Hague ICTY [Hague 'War Crimes
Tribunal'] is not a just court because it
was established by the UN under pressure
from the US with an unjust remit limited
in time and scope to those the US wishes
to vilify. It is totally biased because
it does not bring to justice those in
NATO also involved in the conflict and
responsible for turning a blind eye to
atrocities committed by the Albanians on
the Serbs and others and by NATO on
everyone. In the rest of the world
someone is considered innocent until
proved guilty. In the case of Mr.
Milosevic and Serbia it is exactly the
opposite: the indictments were used to
demonise Milosevic and by easy extension
the Serb people so that NATO could
justify its truly illegal bombing
campaign and the consequent occupation of
a segment of a sovereign state.
I call upon all intelligent people of
this world to question what is going on
and raise their voices in protest.
Ilia Baskakov, Toronto, Canada
I understand that NATO is a criminal
organization and it`s leaders are war
criminals. Mr. Milosevic only tried to
save integrity of his country. I do not
understand, how could Mr. Kostunica shake
Javier Solana`s hand, as he did this
February? Who is Mr. Kostunica after
that? Mr. Milosevic must be free, NATO
leaders must be, instead of him, in
Serbian jail!
Mr. Milosevic supporters in Jugoslavia
should know: that they are not alone. And
shame to Kostunica!
Theophilos Grammenos, Athens, Greece
and London, England
Please, do me the honour of adding my
name to the list of undersigned
individuals. My name is Theophilos
Grammenos and i am also signing on behalf
of my father Costas and mother Anna. We
are Greek citizens, living in both Athens
and London and nothing would be more
gratifying to us than the release and
rehabilitation of President Milosevic
,the symbol of his noble Serbian nation's
struggle against the hideous moral
monster which is American and NATO
criminal expansionism ,a simple regional
manifestation of which is the
institutionalisation of criminal and
terrible Albanian extremism, a monstrous
birth which will, unless stopped, now
engulf and destroy the whole of the
Balkans, including my country, Greece.
Kemalgazi, Turkey
Yugoslavia is an experimental area for
Nato. Nato tries to change geographic,
demographic and political situation of
the region according to it's interests. I
refuse the Nato intervention to my
region!
Doug Kennedy, New Zealand
I wish you all the best in your
endeavours to have Slobodan released. I
would have hoped for a bit more of a
commitment from Russian polies to have
that so called Court of Justice [the
Hague 'War Crimes Tribunal'] dismantled,
because sure as eggs they may be the next
ones facing the Supreme U.S Justice.
Evgenij Vladislavovich Chikunov
I fully support the cause of S.
Miloshevich and so I realise that nobody
in power really cares about my or even
your opinions in any case (and that is
one of the lessons we have gotten here
during the course of
"democratic" reforms), I sign
the petition. Mostly to show my support
to your efforts and my esteem to Mr.
Miloshevich.
Luis Cayetano, Sydney, Australia
I am signing this petition not because I
have any particular admiration for Mr.
Milosevic, but because I am aware that
the rape of Yugoslavia has been the
result of a giant conspiracy perpetrated
by the West. One only has to look at the
blatant lies and omissions from Western
leaders to see this. Let all members of
American Congress and British and German
parliament know about this petition, as
well as these nations' respective leaders
and cabinets. Even if they ignore you,
the fact that they ignore will expose
them, their arrogance.
Dr. Edward W. Miller, California, USA
Milosevic is being retained illegally to
await an illegal trial in an illegal
court...A tribunal hastily pasted
together in the UN Security Council in
defiance of the UN Charter, which clearly
requires the UN Assembly of nations to
construct such a court . This
US-constructed so-called Tribunal is but
a paper-tiger meant to be employed by the
NATO politicians and their media to
distract public attention form the
catastrophic war which NATO waged against
the Yugoslavian people. Kostunica has
become a whore of the West and will turn
Milosevic over to Del Ponte's judiciary
mob just to save his own skin. We must
keep up pressure on our representatives
to prevent this tragedy from playing out
on the world stage.
Guy Roy, Lévis, QC
Je suis d'accord pour que mon nom figure
sur une liste de revendication pour
libérer Milosévich qui n'a fait que
résister ŕ la mondialisation
impérialiste en voulant préserver
l'économie Yougoslave des griffes des
investisseurs.
Merci de me permettre de protester contre
le harcčlement d'un leader qui restera
dans la mémoire des peuples comme un
résistant.
William Spring, Chairman, Christians
Against NATO Aggression (CANA), London,
UK
The continued incarceration of Mr.
Milosevic is the most extraordinary
example of American-EU-Blairite arrogance
and inhumanity yet witnessed, at least
since the end of hostilities between
EU-NATO and the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia.
EU-NATO now resembles a debauched version
of the later Roman Empire. Washington
collects heads of state, (like Noriega,
like Milosevic) and would if they could
parade their victims through the streets
in a triumphal gala. This is a symptom of
the decadence and arrogance of American
power. Will it be Putin next?
Patriotic forces in Yugoslavia should
insist on the release of Mr. Milosevic.
Washington, and its accomplice in Europe,
Belgrade bomber and butcher Blair, have
no understanding of diplomacy: all
NATO-EU understands is
threats/force/deceit/misinformation and
the US-Blairite alliance is now heading
us directly into world war three. Lord
Robertson brags on British radio how NATO
killed Arkan and how NATO keeps Milosevic
locked up. We are the Lords of the
Universe. Yugoslavia is enslaved.
Helmuth Fellner, Wien (Vienna),
Austria
At the same time that the European Social
Democrats have elected the British war
criminal Cook as their chairman, while
the war criminal Fischer from the
[German] Green Party and the SPD-war
criminal Scharping are saying nothing
regarding their unmasked propaganda lies,
while the bandits from the KLA are
plotting [provoking?] the next war-zone,
Slobodan Milosevic is unlawfully jailed.
The breakup of Yugoslavia with all the
harm which resulted from it, is primarily
a result of the foreign policy of the
European Union under the influence of
Germany and Austria, referring to the
Austrian-monarchist German-nationalist
thinking of revanchism. For their plans
against Yugoslavia and particularly
against the Serbian people these
political forces have found with Mr.
Djindjic a compliant Trojan horse.
Freedom for Slobo!
Sladjana Rascanin, Calgary, Canada
I would like to join people who are
signing petition to free Mr. Milosevic.
I am signing this petition since I
believe that everyone is innocent until
proven guilty. So far, Slobodan Milosevic
is accused, and already pronounced
guilty, of several crimes. None of his
"crimes" is proved; he even has
not been to the court yet. But his
biggest crime is that he is a Srb who did
not sell his, and his people's soul, to
the mighty US and NATO.
As a Srb, and a Canadian, I am sick of
obsequious Zoran Djindjic and his fellow
politicians. I am even sicker of
Kostunica, that "honest" Srb
who is, together with Djindjic, selling
what is left of Yugoslavia to biggest
criminals in the world. I am sure that
all Srbs, who died fighting for their
freedom in all the wars of Serbs'
history, are turning in their graves now,
and cursing the worst Serbian scum, who
unfortunately, with US money, got the
power to put Serbs on their knees!
Something in which none of our worst
enemies succeeded....
My heart bleeds, I cry for my people who
have gone through all this for so long,
but I still believe that Serbs are going
to survive as always. And Kostunica and
Djindjic are going to share place in
Serbs history reserved for Vuk Brankovic.
Roberto Mantovani, Bonn, Germany
I agree with this petition for the reason
that those powers who want Milosevic at
The Hague have no right to judge him.
These powers have done so much to let
Yugoslavia go up in flames and terror,
from the US Foreign Operations
Appropriations Law of 1990 and German
(and British etc.) logistic, political
and military support for the secessions
of Slovenia and Croatia, over years of
sanctions, unilateral support for civil
war parties (Croats, Muslims) in Bosnia
and their ethnic cleansing of each other
and especially of Serbs, US support for
every destructive Izetbegovic move
("if you don't like it, why sign
it"), the support and even creation
of Albanian terrorism and ethnic
cleansing in Kosovo (Germany's BND,
Britain's SAS forces etc.) before, during
and, what's even more shameful, after the
war under direct Western responsibility
and supervision, the fake peace talks at
Rambouillet (now Bulgaria has granted
NATO peacefully what Yugoslavia did not
want to give up at Rambouillet, the
sovereignty over their territory (see.
www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3aa0fc2a19d8.htm),
the importation of war to Macedonia, with
a German Foreign Minister stating that
the Albanian national question is open
(instead of dutifully decrying the
dangers of "Greater Albanian
nationalism" like those of
"Greater Serbian nationalism").
About the fanatical bias of the ITCY
judges and prosecutors everything has
already been said and repeated.
Why have old fascist allies in hardly
changed uniforms and without changes in
mentality gotten such radical and near to
unconditional support from Germany? What
is there in store for European borders
drawn in 1919 and 1945 that may be
"just" or not, but that could
be changed only at the price of an
overall war, with "national
questions" looming everywhere? What
will become of Europe and of the world,
if the War Party (whether neo-fascist or
simply globalist gone mad) will enjoy a
victory like a Milosevic trial at The
Hague undisputed?
Gliso Bjelos, Sydney, Australia.
Please, if anyone out there honestly
believes in the 'Hague' as a judicial
court system with any sort of ethics,
then you must surely believe in the
Easter Bunny and Goblins. I gladly add my
name to this petition, as, one day, when
the people of the world who are being
suppressed by NATO come to realize that
NATO is nothing more then a Terrorist
Organization based on world domination,
hiding behind its 'Hague' and so called
Humanitarian Rights organizations, I will
be able to say: "I was a part of the
petition that made this glorious day
possible, the day that NATO fell to her
knees."
The Serbian people are not and never have
been puppets. Can someone please explain
that to Mr. Kostunica, Mr. Bush and the
rest of them, who obviously have not the
least idea.
Let it be known to any Serbian/Yugoslav
Patriots who defended Serbian/Yugoslav
Land and Law against NATO: You are heroes
in my heart. "
Roland Dion, U.S.A.
The actions of NATO War Criminals must
not be validated by acknowledging the
ICTY as a legitimate entity.
Dieter Homann, Germany
Ich unterstütze die Aufforderung an die
jugoslawischen Behörden, S. Miloservic
endlich freizulassen.
|